Wouldnt that be awesome bellator picks up chael and wandy and they duke it out all TRT'd out
Statistics: Posted by CowboyBeebop — Jul 2. 2014, 15:53 — Replies 1 — Views 6
mercredi 2 juillet 2014
Rumor : UFC 174 Did Less Than 100,000 Pay-Per-View Buys
Yesterday, MMAFighting’s Dave Meltzer reported that UFC 173: Barao vs. Dillashaw pulled an estimated 200,000-215,000 pay-per-view buys. While that number is certainly on the low end of UFC buyrates, it’s not a disaster by any means. Keep in mind that UFC 169 — a card that featured a Renan Barao vs. Urijah Faber rematch, Jose Aldo defending his featherweight belt against Ricardo Lamas, and a high-profile heavyweight bout between Alistair Overeem and Frank Mir — only earned an estimated 230,000 buys back in February. On paper, UFC 173 was arguably a weaker offering, but the buyrate wasn’t that far off. Basically, it could have been a lot worse.
The bad news is, last weekend’s UFC 174: Johnson vs. Bagautinov event might have done a historically awful, Bellator-caliber buyrate. First, here’s Meltzer discussing the early estimates in his newsletter yesterday:
“It’s too early to get accurate numbers, but every indication we’ve gotten was very bad, and that it showed a steep decline from UFC 173, which was among the lower numbers of the last eight years. UFC PPV shows usually range from 200,000 to 500,000 Google searches after the event, and are usually in the top few searched for items in the country. A bad show may only do 100,000. Bellator’s show last month hit 100,000. A big show can top 500,000, with the shows that hover around 1 million buys usually doing anywhere from 1 million to 5 million searches. This show did less than 20,000, unheard of for a PPV.
Unlike UFC 173, which looked weak on paper and everyone knew wasn’t going to draw much, it still had Dan Henderson and Daniel Cormier in the No. 2 spot. They brought some star power in what was really the main event. It also had a lot to talk about after, due to T.J. Dillashaw’s upset win over Renan Barao.
This show didn’t have much interest going in. But most of the time, those type of shows deliver good action. This had none of that. It wasn’t terrible, but there was no fight you needed to see. As a likely sign of how the show went, Dana White didn’t even attend the post-fight press conference.”
In response to Meltzer’s story, our twitter friend @Niko138 added some inside information that suggests the UFC 174 buyrate was beyond dismal. Treat this as a rumor for now, but holy crap:
I’ve heard from a couple of people who would know, that early estimates of 174 buys have it just a bit under 100k. The sole reason I am posting about this (I normally try not to be one of those ratings/buys posters who everyone hates) is because if the show truly did this bad, it will be a good thing for us fans who complain about watered down cards. The UFC’s core audience was really being tested with this card, to see how much they could get away with buys wise, for a card with absolutely no drawing power to the casual viewer.
If this is the case, it sends a strong message to the UFC that the watered down cards are no longer going over with fans. For me, considering the cards are $60 and there is 14 a year…this is great news.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the number that comes out in the press is just above that, like 125…If you see the number come out around that area, then trust me, it did under 100k. This has to piss Dana off to no end considering the Bellator show did do a legit 100k
This is really interesting stuff to me, because like I said.. if true, the UFC is going to realize they can’t keep putting on shows like this as a numbered PPV, and expect its fans to continuously just blindly shell out the cash.
That’s a step in the right direction.. they know they are losing PPV buys, and hopefully they step their game up to fix it, by putting on more big fights per card. We can hope anyway.
So, a couple things. MMAPayout’s PPV Blue Book only dates back to UFC 57 in February 2006, and doesn’t show any UFC pay-per-view doing less than 140k buys. But according to Wikipedia (I know, I know), the last UFC PPV that did under 100k buys was UFC 53: Heavy Hitters, which took in just 90,000 buys in June 2005. In other words, you have to go back nine years to find a UFC PPV that performed as terribly as UFC 174 allegedly did.
My other thought is this: “Putting on more big fights per card” is not necessarily the answer. After years of seeing these UFC buyrates ebb and flow, my totally non-scientific conclusion is that 1) casual UFC fans only care about who’s fighting in the main event, and 2) nobody cares about little flyweights. Seriously. Non-Rousey bantamweight and featherweight title fights have always underperformed on pay-per-view, and it should come as no surprise that the first time the UFC tried to put a flyweight title fight in a pay-per-view main event, it would pull record-low numbers.
So, if the 100k buyrate is accurate — or even close to accurate — it’ll get the UFC’s attention. But don’t expect the promotion to start putting together more stacked PPVs in response; remember they have like 50 events/year to fill out, and they simply don’t have the manpower for it. Instead, the UFC’s major takeaway will probably be this: If we have to put a flyweight title fight on a pay-per-view card, there had better be a bigger fight on top of it.
http://ift.tt/1mSkdEl
Statistics: Posted by z0rg — Jul 2. 2014, 15:16 — Replies 0 — Views 13
Brandon Thatch replaces Thiago Alves, meets Jordan Mein on Aug. 23
One of mixed martial arts’ most highly-regarded prospects will return to the Octagon next month.
Elevation Fight Team representative Brandon Thatch will replace the injured Thiago Alves and face Jordan Mein at UFC Fight Night in Tulsa, Okla., on Aug. 23. Promotion officials announced the change on Wednesday; details of Alves’ injury were not disclosed.
UFC Fight Night “Henderson vs. dos Anjos” takes place at the BOK Center and is headlined by a lightweight tilt pitting Benson Henderson against Rafael dos Anjos.
Thatch has impressed in his brief UFC tenure, earning first-round stoppages of Justin Edwards and Paulo Thiago in his first two Octagon appearances. “Rukus” has lost just once in 12 professional outings overall, finishing all of his victories inside of a round.
The 24-year-old Mein already has 37 pro bouts to his credit. “Young Gun” is 2-1 in the UFC, capturing a split verdict over Hernani Perpetuo in his last appearance this past April.
Alves recently returned to the cage following a two-year hiatus. It was a successful venture for the American Top Team product, as he outpointed Seth Baczynski at UFC on Fox 11
http://ift.tt/1jKpDfM
This is one to look forward to. I like Mein a lot, but I'm gonna pick Thatch.
Statistics: Posted by Waftist — Jul 2. 2014, 14:09 — Replies 0 — Views 8
UFC FN 49 -- Demian Maia vs. Mike Pyle, Thales Leites vs. Francis Carmont **POLL**
A pair of intriguing matchups has been added to August’s UFC Fight Night 49 events, as Demian Maia faces Mike Pyle, and Thales Leites meets Francis Carmont.
UFC officials today announced the new matchups for the card, which takes place Aug. 23 at BOK Center in Tulsa, Okla. The bout order for the card has yet to be revealed, but the evening’s main card will air on FOX Sports 1.
Maia (19-6 MMA, 13-6 UFC) fights for the 20th time under the UFC banner. The Brazilian jiu-jitsu specialist reached the top of the promotion’s middleweight division in 2010, when he suffered a decision loss to Anderson Silva in a failed bid for the 185-pound title. In 2012, he dropped to 170 pounds, where he picked up three big wins before suffering through a two-fight losing streak. Most recently, he snapped that skid with a May victory over promotional newcomer Alexander Yakovlev.
Meanwhile, Pyle (26-9-1 MMA, 9-4 UFC) fights for the first time since a February win over T.J. Waldburger. The 38-year-old veteran of the UFC, Strikeforce, Affliction, EliteXC and IFL, among others, is enjoying one of the best stretches of his 15-year career, as he’s currently 5-1 in his past six fights with the lone loss in that stretch coming to top contender Matt Brown.
Leites (23-4 MMA, 8-3) is currently an honorable mention on the latest USA TODAY Sports/MMAjunkie MMA middleweight rankings. A onetime UFC title challenger who was dropped from the promotion in 2009 following back-to-back losses, Leities has enjoyed a resurgence of late, boasting a six-fight winning streak that includes UFC wins over Trevor Smith, Ed Herman and Tom Watson.
Meanwhile, Carmont (22-9 MMA, 6-2 UFC) is ranked No. 13 in the latest USA TODAY Sports/MMAjunkie MMA middleweight rankings. The Frenchman is a training partner of former UFC welterweight champion Georges St-Pierre and boasted an imposing winning streak until dealing with recent losses to C.B. Dollaway and Ronaldo “Jacare” Souza.
With the additions to the card, the UFC Fight Night 49 lineup now includes:
Rafael dos Anjos vs. Benson Henderson
Demian Maia vs. Mike Pyle
Francis Carmont vs. Thales Leites
Timothy Elliott vs. Wilson Reis
Thiago Alves vs. Jordan Mein
Tom Niinimaki vs. Chas Skelly
Mirsad Bektic vs. Ernest Chavez
Matt Hobar vs. Aaron Phillips
http://ift.tt/1oojTg9
Statistics: Posted by moose84 — Jul 2. 2014, 11:19 — Replies 1 — Views 9
mardi 1 juillet 2014
WSOF 11's Jon Fitch: It's 'disgusting' champ Rousimar Palhares turned down NBC slot
In our latest WSOF 11 sit-down with MMAjunkie’s John Morgan, co-headliners Jon Fitch and Dennis Hallman hit on a variety of topics, including Fitch’s growing resentment toward reigning WSOF welterweight champ Rousimar Palhares.
Fitch (25-6-1), who meets Hallman (53-14-2) in Saturday’s NBC-televised co-main event at Ocean Center in Daytona, Fla., originally was scheduled to fight Palhares (16-6) for the title. But Palhares withdrew from the fight after his mom was scheduled for surgery to treat extreme thrombosis in her legs.
After a series of changes, Fitch ultimately was booked against fellow vet Hallman, but he’s still ticked he lost the original fight with Palhares.
“I think it’s kind of disgusting that he could turn down a title defense on NBC,” said Fitch, who is one of the bigger names on the organization’s first network-televised card. “Yeah, his mother was sick, but my dad’s having a heart procedure the Tuesday before our fight, so stuff happens. Deal with it.”
So why the animosity?
“I have a distaste for unprofessional behavior,” he said. “I act in a very professional way in this sport. I take it very serious, and I do not like it when people come around and act in an amateur way.”
source: http://ift.tt/TAVHvq (there's a short video of the interview on the site)
Sooo... Palhares vs. Fitch. Now, you can't tell me you don't want to see it. In fact, at this point I don't think I'm looking forward to anything more than to see Fitch fight the monster.
Your thoughts on the matter and generally on their potential fight? It wouldn't be potential if Palhares wasn't a sissy.
Statistics: Posted by vstipic23 — Jul 2. 2014, 00:49 — Replies 0 — Views 1
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)