Many low-mid monitoring devices better than one high mid range for 'bedroom' users?

To me after some application of logic and common sense this seems like a straight yes. But I'd be very interested to hear the opinions of studio owners/staff/me's/etc



What I mean by 'bedroom' producers is people with semi-pro at best sound treatment and anything below, smaller rooms with imperfect conditions.



So what i'm asking, this is just a quick theoretical example, is say...



rather than a pair of k-120's rrp about £1g are we not going to get a better overall picture from maybe dt770, sen 380, dynaudio bm5a2's?



Because there would still be about £300 left over on the the k-120's, for maybe an extra and you would have four, in theory accurate but different systems to check on.



As for what I'm talking about on usage, just to get work ready for use, ready to be played out, ready to be sent off etc etc.



Obviously not trying to compete with the level of clarity/detail/accuracy a full studio can, pretty pointless exercise imo.



Over the last few years what you can get for so little has really shot up through the roof from where I stand. Not to mention these new JBL's everyone seems so excited about, £100 each 0.o.

Many low-mid monitoring devices better than one high mid range for 'bedroom' users?