Today while tweaking my new setup it was time to do a test:
I've got a typical EDM track and mastered it 3 ways (no particular order)
2x OTB
chain 1: Madison > Sigma > M/S Master > SCL-1 > BAX EQ > HM2 Nail > Tascam DA3000 AD > Barricade
chain 2: Madison > Sigma > API 2500 > API 5500 > Tascam DA3000 AD > Barricade
1x ITB being ONLY Barricade, matching loudness with only input gain :)
Purpose of the test was to see where throwing in all the "loud" tricks (converter clipping, turning off ISP, raising wavelab volume ITB etc.etc. )while "preserving dynamics" made each version go.
4 differences you might appreciate:
- Tone & weight
- appearant loudness
- dynamics
- breathing / limiting artifacts.
There is nothing scientific about it. but it sort of shows the differences between ITB & OTB, as well as OTB component choice (API has a distinct sound)
I've shuffled and labelled them A,B,C for the ones that like guessing.
I've got a typical EDM track and mastered it 3 ways (no particular order)
2x OTB
chain 1: Madison > Sigma > M/S Master > SCL-1 > BAX EQ > HM2 Nail > Tascam DA3000 AD > Barricade
chain 2: Madison > Sigma > API 2500 > API 5500 > Tascam DA3000 AD > Barricade
1x ITB being ONLY Barricade, matching loudness with only input gain :)
Purpose of the test was to see where throwing in all the "loud" tricks (converter clipping, turning off ISP, raising wavelab volume ITB etc.etc. )while "preserving dynamics" made each version go.
4 differences you might appreciate:
- Tone & weight
- appearant loudness
- dynamics
- breathing / limiting artifacts.
There is nothing scientific about it. but it sort of shows the differences between ITB & OTB, as well as OTB component choice (API has a distinct sound)
I've shuffled and labelled them A,B,C for the ones that like guessing.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire